Members of Alcoholics Anonymous and similar addiction programs begin their process of recovery by first admitting their addiction and powerlessness over it. That starts clearing away the blind spot that up until then made their life very problematic. This first step parallels Buddha’s first step of his Eight-Fold Path—Right Comprehension.
Primal instinct drives them all
To continue believing “I” am in control of life and can find a way to change and enhance my “self” is the dead end every addict travels until he surrenders and admits he is powerless. Alcoholics Anonymous and other addiction mitigating programs have shown this is true. What is new here is that I suggest we are biologically addicted (via survival instincts) to our need for and sense of free will… choice, control, power.
We need a program!
“Hello, my name is Carl and I am a free willer“(1). I imagine many would balk at this idea. While this isn’t a substance abuse addiction as such, there are too many parallels to other addictions to deny. Nevertheless, denial is certain until we as addicts are ready to see our addiction. The hump we must surmount is the blind spot the addiction causes. The blind spot here is simple to see: if we believe we are in control, how can we entertain any suggestion, let alone biological proof, that we are not? In the case of free will we think, “I control this” (_you name it_). If not ‘this or that’, then we believe others control ‘this or that’ — unaware that instinct is driving it all.
The brain has a mind of its own
Like all animals, from birth, we are instinctively ‘programmed’ to feel a need to control life as best we can, by either contending or cooperating. It is simply part of the survival instinct. Feeling instinctively driven to wield power and control to win at life generates thoughts in humans that mirror this visceral certainty. Even if we doubt we have the ‘power’, we want it and/or think other people have it, or should have it.
This ‘disease’ begins very early in life — indeed, as soon as we begin to think. Chapter 71 says, Realizing I don’t know is better; not knowing this knowing is disease. We get off on the wrong foot so early in life; it is easy to see why it takes so long, if ever, to realize I don’t know.
Admitting the cycle weakens it.
I’ve taken the 12 Step Program and modified it to fit with a Taoist point of view. This means dropping references to ‘wrongs’, ‘God’, and Judeo-Christian-Islamic morality in general. If one actually does well on the first step, the rest will follow naturally without forcing the issue, at least from a Taoist point of view. Sincerely embracing the 1st step gets the ball rolling. I chose ‘we’ rather than ‘I’ because this is more about our human condition than an individual ‘I’ condition. I also offer parallels to Buddha’s Eight Fold Path: Right Comprehension; Right Resolution, etc.
- We admit we are powerless over instinct. Believing ourselves in control makes life less manageable. (Right Comprehension)
- We come to understand that a power greater than ourselves — nature — can help restore us to sanity through balanced understanding. (Right Comprehension)
- We resolve to turn our will and our lives over to the care of nature, as we understand it. (Right Resolution)
- We strive fearlessly for self-honesty. (Right Comprehension, Right Resolution)
- We admit to ourselves and to other human beings the exact nature of our ‘disease’. (Right Speech, Right Action)
- We’re ready to allow nature to be responsible for all aspects of our character. (Right Effort, Right Thought)
- We humbly ask to see our so-called shortcomings and virtues as merely natural variation — the diversity of life for which we can neither accept blame nor claim merit. (Right Comprehension, Right Living, Right Thought)
- We recall all persons we have judged and are willing to reconsider matters until we find balance, often by noticing the same ‘fault’ within ourselves. (Right Thought)
- We will make direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others. (If one is in accord with all the other steps and feels amends necessary, this would happen naturally). (Right Action)
- We will continue to take personal inventory and to be constantly vigilant. When we see our blindness in life’s rear view mirror, we promptly admit it. (We can assume blindness was/is present whenever we felt/feel emotion—the stronger the emotion, the blinder we become.) (Right Thought)
- We seek through thoughtful introspection to improve our conscious connection with nature as we understand it, praying only for knowledge of nature’s will for us and the ability to yield to it gracefully. (Right Thought, Right State of Peaceful Mind)
- When we have some awakening as the result of these steps, we model this in action and word as a means to bring the way to other likewise diseased folks. (Right Speech, Right Action, Right Living, Right Effort…)
That’s not all Folks!
Merely realizing that free will is a myth doesn’t purge the instinct that drives our deepest sense of this. Still, just acknowledging that one is ‘addicted’ to a sense of personal power and free will to control life is a huge step. Nevertheless, it is fair to say that managing this ‘addiction’ is more difficult than abstaining from normal forms of addiction. Like all animals, we do have force-of-will and exercise it continuously. We can’t abstain from this, and being a primal emotion, force-of-will continuously kindles thought. Therefore, the only countermeasure is the counter-thought of Right Mindfulness — applied continuously.
I deal with this by challenging the illusion each time it appears. That means suspecting any thought where the word ‘should’ rears its judgmental head (2). Chapter 71’s Realizing I don’t know is better; not knowing this knowing is disease, keeps me on my toes as long as I continuously keep it in the back of my intuitive mind. Life is serious business; chapter 64 points the way:
Its peace easily manages, Its presence easily plans,
Its fragility easily melts, Its timeliness easily scatters,
Acts without existing, Governs without disorder.
A tree barely embraceable grows from a fine tip.
A terrace nine layers high rises from piled earth.
A thousand mile journey begins below the feet.
Of doing we fail, Of holding on we lose.
Taking this, the wise do nothing, hence never fail,
Hold nothing, hence never lose.
People in their affairs always accomplish some, yet fail.
Being as careful at the end as the beginning as a rule never fails.
Taking this, the wise person desires non desire,
And does not value difficult to obtain goods.
Learns non learning and turns around people’s excesses,
As well as assists all things naturally, and never boldly acts.
(1) For much of my life I believed in free will — explicitly. I ‘knew’ I had the power to choose what “I” wanted. “I” was in control, or so “I” thought. I do have a rather strong will and persevere until I drop, which undoubtedly helped bolster this belief. Then at around 40, I had an epiphany. I wasn’t as independent as I thought. I admitted that I depended upon everything for life right down to every breath of oxygen I took. This oxygen, by the way, graciously supplied to me by plants. Within a few years, I began wondering about free will itself, and began earnestly looking for evidence of its existence that I couldn’t explain in simpler biological ways.
Now, 30 years later, I have found no evidence. All I see are biological forces directing the choices I make. Poof went my belief in free will, and yet certain feelings arise that suggest I still ‘believe’ in free will at times. I now finally realize that it doesn’t matter what you believe or don’t believe — instinct rules in the end. The human belief in free will, whether explicit or implied, arises from a visceral instinctive need felt by all animals to control their lives, i.e., win, succeed, come out on top. We can’t help it; it is innate. However, we can come to recognize this instinct’s influence over our lives. We can be recovering free willers.
Once we begin distrusting our beliefs in free will, we can at least tone down the certainty and start Realizing I don’t know is better; not knowing this knowing is disease. The certainty of knowing we have free will is the disease, not the instinctive need to control circumstances — that is universal. Finally, holding onto believing “I” have free will is one of the most powerful forces involved in causing the illusion of self — the “I” that controls life. The best part of all this is how this realization makes me less hypocritical. Hypocrisy does not enhance the quality of life — just the opposite. Indeed, hypocrisy and self-honesty are opposites. I am independent by nature, but no longer see this as the strength I once did; it is just as much a weakness!
(2) The continuous ‘shoulds’ we project daily are commonly subtle. To notice them requires vigilant self-honesty. Keeping a daily chart to mark down your ‘transgressions’ helps deepen awareness.
Obviously, the younger you are, the less life experience you have to validate my observations. Evidence, if you seek it, will accumulate over a lifetime. In the meantime, challenge what I say and check your experience of life. Having doubts is healthy and wise, and a good sign that your ‘shoulds’ are lying low. Concrete certainty is simply a symptom of one’s own insecurity, and the attempt to hold onto one’s story, i.e., Buddha’s 2nd Truth: “the illusion of self originates and manifests itself in a cleaving to things“. It is from that insecurity steeped in fear and need that the ‘should’ rears its judgmental head.
Finally, I can’t end this without asking, is not what I’m saying here just another story? Certainly it is, at least up to a point. Anything spoken or written runs counter to the constant way. I strive to find as impartial and balanced view as possible, mostly observing and giving voice to the connections and similarities I notice. To me, this is called profound sameness. Truth lies in similarities. Differences are illusions of relative truths. See Peeking in on Nature’s Hoodwink and How the Hoodwink Hooks.
The paradox here is that the saying of all this is a story ultimately; yet the origin of the words is not a story, but an observation. For example, seeing the Sun rise in the East is not a story; saying the Sun rises in the East is a story. Correlations serve as a window into reality; nailing down the details in a story fogs up that window. It is a delicate balance between two sides of awareness: Knowing doesn’t speak; speaking doesn’t know. To what extent I maintain balance or to what extent ‘correlations’ are that window into reality, is up to each observer to decide. In the end, truth is in the eye of the beholder.