Small ‘t’ Taoists

I got to thinking over yesterday’s Beyond Spooky post. In particular, I was wondering what effect, if any, the capitalization of proper names has on Western thought. One thing I appreciate about Chinese characters is the lack of capitalization. The character 道 (dào or tao) means road, way, path; channel, course; way, path; doctrine, principle; Taoism, Taoist; superstitious sect; line; say, talk, speak; think, suppose. However, the only way to distinguish between road and capital ‘T’ Taoism is through context, not capitalization. By design, capitalization skews perception toward elitism — or at least does nothing to counteract it.

I think of myself as a small ‘t’ Taoist, but my computer automatically changes the small ‘t’ that I type to a capital T. Thinking of myself as a small ‘t’ rather than a capital ‘T’ Taoist feels more egalitarian, impartial, and connected to the whole. In other words, less tribal and more in line with chapter 67…

The whole world says that my way is vast and resembles nothing.
It is because it is vast that it resembles nothing.
If it resembled anything, it would, long before now,
. . . have become small.

Without capitalization, the way resembles nothing more than when it’s capitalized as The Way. Capitalization promotes a ‘wall’ of difference, just the opposite of “resembles nothing”.

This ‘wall’ of difference only heightens the perceived difference between groups, especially politics, religion, ethnicity, sports, and nation-states. While such tribal associations are innate and natural, such ‘walls’ only hinder comprehension of chapter 56’s, This is known as mysterious sameness. As chapter 20 puts it, Vulgar people are clear. I alone am drowsy. Vulgar people are alert. I alone am muddled.