Preface: Undoubtedly, the human brain’s mind instinctively needs a story for its thoughts to play out. The following “immortality” story is worth considering as it may offer what chapter 16 hints as, The way therefore long enduring, nearly rising beyond oneself.
Yes, you are immortal… we’re all immortal! Certainly, that bold claim demands proof. The proof I have will stand up to your scrutiny only if you concur with Buddha’s account of what ‘you’, ‘I’, and ‘we’ actually are. However, if you don’t accept Buddha’s Four Noble Truths (p.604), at least in principle, this post may not be your cup of tea. My view of our immortality is linked to Buddha’s 2nd Noble Truth in particular. Note the underlined comments about our “illusion of self”:
The Second Noble Truth is the cause of suffering. The cause of suffering is lust. The surrounding world affects sensation and begets a craving thirst that clamors for immediate satisfaction. The illusion of self originates and manifests itself in a cleaving to things. The desire to live for the enjoyment of self entangles us in a net of sorrows. Pleasures are the bait and the result is pain.
I’ve been reviewing Buddha’s Truths during my morning headstand for decades, and it’s taken that long to fathom completely the connection between my self and my holdings. Why? The we only understand what we know hypothesis (p.254) is the simplest and most elegant answer. I should add that this daily review is always insightful only if I own it intuitively, and not merely a rote repetition.
About 10 years ago(1) I really started taking particular notice of this “illusion of self” aspect, and began feeling how entwined my sense of self and my possessions were. By possessions, I mean whatever I value, be they material things, ideals, or beliefs — no matter. The holding-on-to, regardless of what, produces and maintains the “illusion of self” — the ego.
The Immortal Illusion of Self
The more deeply I can connect myself, my ego, to just the holding-on-to experience, the more universal “I am” feels. In other words, it is not the particular object or ideal to which I cling, but the clinging experience that connects me to the immortal. On the other hand, the more I cling to particular objects or ideals the more mortal I inevitably feel.
The universal clinging dynamic doesn’t die when a particular individual’s body dies. This is called profound sameness as chapter 56 hints. The clinging dynamic continues by all those who live out their lives, generation after generation. The illusion of “I” is maintained, ad infinitum…
… Or until our Sun bloats up into a red giant, expanding until it consumes the Earth’s orbit. The heating Sun will evaporate the Earth’s oceans away, and then solar radiation will blast away the hydrogen from the water. The Earth will never have oceans again. It will eventually become molten again.
… Or perhaps not until even then. Even then, ‘The illusion of self originates and manifests itself in a cleaving to things’ process will continue to play itself out in other sentient creatures somewhere else in the universe.
… Or perhaps, ad infinitum will end if the universe just peters out as it expands into its cold dark future. On the other hand, perhaps the universe will fold back onto itself, implode as it were, and presto, initiate the next Big Bang. Then immortality will truly continue forever.
Returning to Earth
Even better, we are not only immortal going forward. Immortality flows backward in time as well. Embracing a firmer sense of the “illusion of self” origin, also connects you to all those who have gone before. Simply said, you are now living through the same essential experience as all those long dead and gone experienced before you. Life’s struggle continues through your life currently. In essence, you are them—this is just Tvat Tvam Asi from another angle.
Naturally, this all comes down to a matter of perspective. Other animals have no thought of their mortality and thus no longing for immortality. Our unique cognitive ability (thinking) burdens us with the “illusion of self”. This can really mess with intuitive knowing; yet it can also help liberate us from this predicament. The first step is just realizing one simple fact: ‘it’ is mind only. For a full serving of mind only, google [Cittamatra] and [The Vijnanvada Conception Of “Consciousness-Only].
Profound sameness can open the door to immortality
Our awareness of mortality is very much a result of how we differentiate perceptions. I imagine the practical reason for distinguishing differences is similar to the ‘divide and conquer’ approach to achieving victory. Victory here is an ability to manipulate our environment, and naming the things we are aware of allows us to do just that amazingly well. We have vast control over our environment in countless ways. The price we pay is a keen perception of death, and our own mortality. This begins with giving ourselves personal names, and extends throughout our lives as we continue to define “I” am. The “I” creates an explicit mortality. The more “unique” the “I”, the more mortal we become.
One way to dilute the “I” is through striving to notice the similarities—profound sameness—between that which appears so different on the surface. Much of those differences have been educated into us from infancy, and so unlearning(2) is the name of the game here, if you wish to enjoy immortality..
Finally, I should suggest cosmic consciousness as a useful synonym for the word immortality in order to avoid thinking immortality means the “I” lives on forever. Speaking of cosmic consciousness, please google [The Nonlocal, Entangled, Conscious Universe – Menas Kafatos].
(1) I wrote about immortality about 10 years ago. After re-reading it, I find I have a subtler sense of it now, but I was heading in the right direction. One notable difference is how I associated immortality with “giving it all up”. To be honest, “giving it all up” is not possible; holding on is entwined with life itself. I suppose “giving up” the “giving up” is what I’m suggesting today.
Or perhaps it is just a matter of trading one’s personal, self-centered agenda for a more transpersonal one. Knowing that holding on is a universal aspect of all life imparts a deep sense of the universal… your life’s flow = my life’s flow = all life’s flow. All living things are in the same boat and that boat continues to float onward regardless of who is onboard (alive).
Another way to consider this is by recognizing what happens within our own body. Each cell strives on, holds on, and pursues its purpose. Cells only live for 7 years on average, yet your life span will be many times longer than that. The striving continues even though every cell dies eventually. Striving is the immortal flow of life. Self-identifying with the striving (the work) rather than with particular outcomes (the rewards) can impart a sense of immortality. Striving is life’s common denominator while outcomes are transient and relative to individual needs. Buddha hinted at this when his disciples begged him to tell them how they should cope with his passing. He said, “All created things must pass, strive on diligently”.
(2) These are some posts that may help unwind “learning”: Ant Are Us, p.216; I Amoeba, p.223; Is Rock Conscious, p.212; Just like Us, Just like Them, p,384; A Bee with Personality, p,289; Swarm Savy, p.107; Networks of Networks, p.308; Who says chickens are stupid, p.380; Loving You Ecosystem, p.455; Cultivating Ego, p.473;