I’ve found that some people in Taoist circles have passionate ideals about cultivating one’s character. Seen from a symptoms point of view, I see passion overall as arising from the mother of need — fear. In this case, they fear lack of control over life, which drives their desire to control life… to cultivate character.
Chapter 54 has the only reference relating to cultivating: Of cultivating in oneself, its virtue only then genuine. Or as D.C. Lau puts it, Cultivate it in your person, And its virtue will be genuine.
The actual character is xiū (修) = embellish; decorate; repair; mend; overhaul; write; compile; build; construct; prune; trim. Notice how embellish and trim are nearly opposite in spirit. Certainly, cultivate is close enough, but what does that really mean?
Taken at face value, isn’t this just a mellower version of a universal moral urge to ‘do the right thing’? Some wish to live a Christian life, others wish for a Buddhist life, or a Taoist life. Atheists also wish the same in their own way, which tells me this urge is universal. In my view, this really amounts to various facets of the free will instinct, as I call it now. Fundamentally, we feel a need to control life, and we want other people to control their lives… to be responsible according to our standards of responsibility.
On the face of it, this feels out of character to a Taoist approach to life, at least as alluded to in the Tao Te Ching. For example: Considering this, the wise person manages without doing anything, Carries out the indescribable teaching.
Cultivating is ‘doing’ something, at least as we usually understand the word’s meaning. With desire choosing anything, of doing I see no satisfied end. All under heaven is divine capacity; nothing must be done either.
Even the desire to not desire is ‘doing’ too much. The Taoist way is truly a most gentle way…
Superior virtue is not virtuous, and so has virtue.
Inferior virtue never deviates from virtue and so is without virtue.
Superior virtue never acts and never believes.
Inferior virtue never acts yet believes.
This reminds me of chapter one’s disclaimer. To paraphrase: The ‘virtue’ possible to think, runs counter to the constant ‘virtue’.
Deeply contained integrity is comparable to a child’s sincerity. The younger the children, the less they over-think life. Just imagine how difficult learning to walk and talk would be, if infants thought about what they were doing — fear + thought = worry, need + thought = desire! This is not to imply that adults shouldn’t think. Rather, we adults can feel a more deeply contained integrity as we sincerely embrace chapter 71: Realizing I don’t’ know is better; not knowing this knowing is disease. Alas, sincerity is not some ‘switch’ we can turn on-and-off.… so much for actively cultivating it.
This is not to imply that we shouldn’t do, but rather do life more as the rest of earth’s animals do life. Chapter 38 hints at this more sincere approach: Foreknowledge of the way, magnificent yet a beginning of folly.
Taking the passages above into consideration, I’d say the Taoist version of ‘cultivating‘ must, if anything, mean ‘trim and prune’. However, even this goes against the view of manages without doing anything, or that nothing must be done either. In my view, what is, is perfect. Any problem I have with what is, only reflects my insecurity surrounding what is. Simply put, at such times, I am disapproving of what is naturally so.
Why is “what is”, not what I want it to be?
Our need to control matters fundamentally arises out of fear, as Fear Rules attempts to point out. Fear drives the need to control life. Fear is a core survival instinct, so freeing ourselves from the free-will illusion urge can’t be in the cards. Still, it does help to admit one is helplessly ‘addicted’ to this urge, as laid out in Free Willers Anonymous. Does that count as ‘cultivating in oneself‘? I have found that knowing the fact that neither any living creature nor I have free will allows me to be much more forgiving of both others and myself.
Okay, if this realization counts as ‘cultivating in oneself‘, then I’m guilty, except for the fact that I had zero choice in the matter. If I had no choice, then I can’t take credit or blame for any cultivating that happened. “I” didn’t do anything. Can you see how nonsensical the notion or free choice is? Yet is it any more nonsensical than say Christmas? Here we have a white bearded jolly fat man traveling in a sky-sled visiting every person on earth doling out goodies once a year. Both stories are deeply held beliefs; the latter by young children, and the former by adults. Perhaps the ‘cultivating in oneself‘ stories are just necessary replacements for the lost Christmas type stories of early childhood. As Christ said, “For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus”… or by faith in whatever we have faith in.
Whoa! it is spooky out here beyond the beyond…
A symptom’s point of view certainly helps me settle this none-sense. As chapter 4 says,
The way flushes and employs the virtue of ‘less’.
Deep like the ancestor of every-thing.
Subdue its sharpness, separate its confusion,
Soften its brightness, be the same as its dust.
Deep and clear, it appears to exist.
I don’t know of whose child it is,
It resembles the ancestor of the Supreme Being.
Speaking of subduing, untying, softening, and being the same as dust…
For this reason,
Unobtainable and intimate,
Unobtainable and distant
Unobtainable and favorable
Unobtainable and fearful
Unobtainable and noble
Unobtainable and humble
For this reason all under heaven value it.
Today, I got to thinking about the possibilities and difficulties of passing on these observations. Among other things, I imagine it depends on how dependant each reader is on the belief in free will. Fear rules; fear compels us to hang on to what we believe we know. Fear blinds us to what is beyond fear.
The question is, does knowing what is going on really help cultivate the ‘Tao’? Considering what actually happens to farmers who cultivate crops in an age-old traditional way helps see this from another angle. These ‘old timers’ are generally resistant to the science if it challenges their traditional and more intuitively based beliefs. Science has also made great strides in disproving our capacity for free will. Yet, those who fear losing this human capacity are very resistant to the science because it challenges their traditional and more intuitively based belief.
That brings us back to the ‘fact’ that real understanding follows intuitive knowing. No wonder it is difficult, if not impossible, to update common understandings to match new facts, especially scientific ones that challenge intuitively based beliefs. Therefore, I imagine we can safely say that if you know that knowing helps cultivate the ‘Tao’, it helps. 😉